Skip to main content

Posts

Social Semiotics

Social Semiotics   is a methodological framework for analyzing how meaning is constructed and communicated within society through various sign systems. This multifaceted approach was initially developed by Michael Halliday in the 1970s and further expanded by scholars like Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen. Social Semiotics is important because it offers a comprehensive way to understand how different modes of communication (such as text, images, gestures, and sounds) create and convey meanings in specific social contexts. It emphasizes the dynamic interplay between signs and social practices, allowing researchers to uncover the underlying cultural, ideological, and power structures embedded within communicative acts. Social Semiotics operates under several guiding principles to decode the meanings of various signs. One fundamental aspect is the spatial positioning of elements within visual compositions , which can significantly influence interpretation. For instance, in Western c...
Recent posts

Online Arguments

Reddit offers a place of sharing, communication, and discourse which can lead to arguments. I happened to come across a post that may lack some aspects of a successful and civil argument. In-N-Out Burger, a highly popular restaurant chain, has received praise from many as having food that is very good and at a great price. The locations are mostly limited to California (while slowly expanding), leaving many, like myself, curious about the food and whether these claims have merit.  In-N-Out Well, one of these curious people finally got to try it themselves, leaving them disappointed with what they received versus the hype that praised it, which was followed by a post on Reddit . While frustration is understandable, this argument leaves more to be desired. The argument lacks constructive feedback. Claims such as "why are people obsessed with innnout? ... but shake shack is actually really good. So WTF?," dismiss others' preferences without offering constructive feedback. I...

The Toulmin Method

The Toulmin method offers a systematic way to analyze and construct arguments, which can be particularly useful in the often chaotic and unstructured environment of online communication. By breaking down arguments into six key components (claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal), the Toulmin method provides clarity and depth, promoting more thoughtful and persuasive online conversations. The Components: Claim: The assertion or point that is being argued Data: The evidence or facts that support the claim. Warrant: The reasoning that connects the data to the claim. Backing: Additional support that reinforces the warrant. Qualifier: Statements that indicate the strength of the claim. Rebuttal: Counter-arguments or statements that acknowledge limitations or exceptions. Purdue University How does this apply to online discussions? Let's say there is a debate about climate change on social media. A claim could be made, such as: "Immediate action is needed to combat cl...

Podcast Research and Online Communication

The podcast, Think Fast Talk Smart from Stanford Business is a series hosted by Matt Abrahams, a lecturer at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Episodes touch upon communication skills and ways for you to improve yours. I'll be focusing on the episode Quick Thinks: How to Shine Online and Excel at Virtual Communication This podcast episode dives into the nuances of virtual online communication, a concept most of us might have dealt with, especially a few years ago during the pandemic. At the start, there's a poignant observation: the shift to virtual communication alters the context in which we interact. The episode goes on to emphasize the importance of attention in virtual communication and brings insights from various experts on keeping audiences engaged.  Matt Abrahams emphasizes the need for a strategic approach to virtual communication, noting, "Attention is the most valuable commodity we have in the world today," suggesting a clear purpose in communication ...

The Battle For Public Opinion

Social media has transformed the landscape of public opinion formation and communication strategies. Virtually anyone can voice their ideas and opinions with the possibility of reaching a large audience. Information spreads rapidly on social media, sometimes gaining virality in minutes. Campaigns can mobilize supporters or counterattack swiftly. The use of algorithms on social media platforms can recommend content to users based on their interests and past views, which may continue to reinforce what they believe instead of showing all perspectives. Some platforms allow anonymity, which can give a user the confidence to say something they wouldn't share publicly otherwise. Medium These factors have  various implications for society, democracy, and interpersonal relationships. For society, social media can bring attention to issues with less representation and amplify marginalized voices , potentially driving change where there otherwise wouldn't be one. Of course, social media ...

Online Communication and the Coca-Cola Company

The Coca-Cola Company is a very established beverage corporation best known for its flagship product, Coca-Cola. The company has grown to become one of the world's leading beverage companies, offering a wide range of beverages including soft drinks, juices, bottled water, sports drinks, and energy drinks. Today, we'll be assessing their  online presence and communication to see how they utilize digital platforms to maintain brand visibility and audience engagement. Coca-Cola has a strong online presence, utilizing various digital platforms for marketing, communication, and engagement with consumers. Their website serves as a hub for information about their products, initiatives, sustainability efforts, and career opportunities. Additionally, the company maintains profiles on most major social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn, where they interact with consumers, share updates, run marketing campaigns, and address customer inquiries. The...

Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants

Marc Prensky describes the " immigrant/native divide " as the difference between those who were not born into the digital world but have adopted digital technology later in life (digital immigrants) and those who have grown up surrounded by digital technology (digital natives). According to Prensky, this divide has affected how students learn in several ways. Digital immigrant educators often find it hard to communicate with digital native students effectively because they speak an "outdated language" compared to the digital language of the students. Information can be misunderstood and difficult to convey. Digital immigrants tend to use traditional teaching methods that may not resonate with digital natives who may prefer something faster, parallel, and interactive. The disconnect can make it challenging for educators to engage digital native students effectively. New skills and interests of digital natives may not be appreciated by digital immigrants, leading to ...